@Taiten: upstream fixed it this way: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2012-June/msg05768.html
It's not issue to fix for quantal (and precise), it just seems such a detail that we didn't rank it high but we can prioritize that if that's an issue for the oem images
@Taiten: upstream fixed it this way: /mail.gnome. org/archives/ commits- list/2012- June/msg05768. html
https:/
It's not issue to fix for quantal (and precise), it just seems such a detail that we didn't rank it high but we can prioritize that if that's an issue for the oem images