Comment 4 for bug 261988

Nice work, Andrew. Here are some suggestions (see debdiff):

* Switch to debhelper 7 (compat, rules, control).
* debian/rules:
  - I have tuned get-orig-source (saver than the previous, you have to recreate your source tarball)
  - Removed all unneeded quotation marks
  - Removed unneeded configure target
  - Empty build target and removed unneeded build-stamp target
* debian/contol:
  - http://code.google.com/p/gnome-colors/ looks like the upstream homepage
  - Split depends line
  - changed short description (not optimal, but better)

I have two questions:

1. Should we rename the binary package names and putting something like icon and theme in the name?

2. How do we implement the bugfix described in the README file:

Due to a bug in Nautilus, you may have to run the following commands for drag n' drop/visiting-folders to look correctly (replace sudo for its equivalent in other linux distros):

sudo rm -f /usr/share/icons/gnome*/*/places/inode-directory.*g
sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome/
sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-brave/
sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-human/
sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-noble/
sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-wine/
sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-wise/