Comment 33 for bug 62749

Revision history for this message
In , Ginn-chen (ginn-chen) wrote :

Sorry, here was a typo. should be bug 251492

(In reply to comment #28)
> (From update of attachment 151670)
> As dbaron's suggestion, the patch in bug 244955 is more reasonable than this
                                           ^^^^^^
> one.
> The difference is only the naming pair.
>