Comment 89 for bug 60995

Revision history for this message
In , Ventnor-bugzilla (ventnor-bugzilla) wrote :

While its probably too late to do anything now, one thing really confuses me:

(In reply to comment #7)
> I had a discussion about this with caillon and some GNOME people and we decided
> that the best option is to make backspace do *nothing*. Page-up is a bit silly
> and "backwards in history" invites dataloss.

If backwards in history invites dataloss then why is the backspace function still on by default in Windows? Is there something I'm missing? If not then this really isn't a good justification at all.