Comment 72 for bug 60995
Revision history for this message
|
|
#72 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
This is absolutely disgusting. We are fighting to get this bug reverted from #325541 and instead we get some developers that decide to take a different step to it and go from reverting it to a patch Robert O'Callahan commits that does NOTHING to revert the actual bug report here. _Idiot_ Then we got another developer, Steffen Wilberg, that says its fixed when it isn't and then even changes the original bug summary to what Robert O'Callahan did.
Now I'm no rocket scientist but do I see a pattern here that when making a bug report or a revert of a change will be overturned if any developer doesn't agree with it? And then they simply ignore us when we ask for a explanation.
Robert O'Callahan should be removed from access here and his patch removed from the SVN repo. Steffen Wilberg should have his access removed as well for his role.
Robert O'Callahan what gives you the right to change the aspect of this bug and turn it into your own version of what it should be?
Steffen Wilberg you must be stupid. I simply can't see your reason on the actions of closing this bug when it has never been fixed.