-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> Do you know if upstream plans to do an official 5.9 release in time for > natty?
No. As mentioned, I've pinged upstream (dhiebert via sf.net) on 2011-03-03, but got no reply.
> If we can, we should rather ship an official release than a > snapshot?
Of course, but given that this snapshot would be the same, apart from the version number, it it rather unimportant.
- -- http://daniel.hahler.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFNf9IlfAK/hT/mPgARAknkAKCaVPiMLC8UvYGPgA4isshBDQKMxgCfQt6W MN1rdR/GnU+JNrpmAPDqRBY= =FAIW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Do you know if upstream plans to do an official 5.9 release in time for
> natty?
No. As mentioned, I've pinged upstream (dhiebert via sf.net) on
2011-03-03, but got no reply.
> If we can, we should rather ship an official release than a
> snapshot?
Of course, but given that this snapshot would be the same, apart from
the version number, it it rather unimportant.
- -- daniel. hahler. de/ enigmail. mozdev. org/
http://
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFNf9IlfAK /hT/mPgARAknkAK CaVPiMLC8UvYGPg A4isshBDQKMxgCf Qt6W GnU+JNrpmAPDqRB Y=
MN1rdR/
=FAIW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----