On Aug 9, 2007, at 8:50 PM, Michael R. Head wrote:
> 122961
Well, perhaps it is the same bug, but I am not exactly sure. I have
posted some screenshots and some pictures that I took from my
computer. Perhaps you could tell if the problem is the same or not,
but it is extreme to the point of being unusable, unfortunately.
The resolution with which the computer is started is 1280x1204 with
24 bits per pixel and I lack the memory for this to work,
unfortunately (I only have a G400 with 16MB of VRAM, as you may
already have read from my other posts to this bug).
Hi, Michael.
On Aug 9, 2007, at 8:50 PM, Michael R. Head wrote:
> 122961
Well, perhaps it is the same bug, but I am not exactly sure. I have
posted some screenshots and some pictures that I took from my
computer. Perhaps you could tell if the problem is the same or not,
but it is extreme to the point of being unusable, unfortunately.
The resolution with which the computer is started is 1280x1204 with
24 bits per pixel and I lack the memory for this to work,
unfortunately (I only have a G400 with 16MB of VRAM, as you may
already have read from my other posts to this bug).
If you have any solution, please let me know.
Regards, Rogério Brito.
-- {mackenzie, ime.usp} .br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 www.ime. usp.br/ ~rbrito : http:// meusite. mackenzie. com.br/ rbrito berlios. de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth. debian. org
Rogério Brito : rbrito@
http://
Projects: algorithms.