13:33 < cjwatson> stgraber,kees: or perhaps --error-handler=true ...
13:33 -!- chrisccoulson [~chr1s@ubuntu/member/chrisccoulson] has joined #ubuntu-devel
13:33 < kees> cjwatson: yeah, that might be the better approach, since "start" really should fail if it's disabled, imo
13:34 -!- bryceh [~<email address hidden>] has
joined #ubuntu-devel
13:34 < cjwatson> kees: IIRC, it might need to be '|| { stop; exit 0; }' or some such, if we were going for exit 0
13:34 < cjwatson> though I'd have to check - error-handler is simpler
13:34 < stgraber> yeah, I guess it makes sense for start to fail when the service is disabled as it didn't start :)
13:34 -!- tremolux [~<email address hidden>] has
quit [Quit: Bye]
13:35 < cjwatson> does one of you want to take care of this, or should I?
13:35 < cjwatson> if somebody else does, I can accept it through the queue :-)
13:36 < stgraber> I can do it
This is currently being worked on.
13:33 < cjwatson> stgraber,kees: or perhaps --error- handler= true ... ubuntu/ member/ chrisccoulson] has joined
#ubuntu- devel
really should fail if it's disabled, imo
some such, if we were going for exit 0
service is disabled as it didn't start :)
13:33 -!- chrisccoulson [~chr1s@
13:33 < kees> cjwatson: yeah, that might be the better approach, since "start"
13:34 -!- bryceh [~<email address hidden>] has
joined #ubuntu-devel
13:34 < cjwatson> kees: IIRC, it might need to be '|| { stop; exit 0; }' or
13:34 < cjwatson> though I'd have to check - error-handler is simpler
13:34 < stgraber> yeah, I guess it makes sense for start to fail when the
13:34 -!- tremolux [~<email address hidden>] has
quit [Quit: Bye]
13:35 < cjwatson> does one of you want to take care of this, or should I?
13:35 < cjwatson> if somebody else does, I can accept it through the queue :-)
13:36 < stgraber> I can do it