I intent to work on this bug. I'm new en found this bug in Harvest. This bug is not verry active, so I think I have the time I to investigate how to manage bugs, deb-packages, patches...
I've checked with a fresh installation of amule on a Saucy installation, it stores music in ~/.aMule/incomming
In perspective of accasibility, I agree with this bug report. A normal user wouldn't look for his downloads in a hidden folder.
But the folder Downloads isn't logical neighter. Your aMule downloads will be mixed with the normal downloads (ex firefox)...
Who should I ask to help me pick the right folder? (I think 'Music' makes more sense but a seperate visible folder 'aMule' would to)
For now I didn't got a answer from the aMule community, but will it be ok just to make a Ubuntu patch without implementing the patch upstream (should they choos to keep the current folder)?
I intent to work on this bug. I'm new en found this bug in Harvest. This bug is not verry active, so I think I have the time I to investigate how to manage bugs, deb-packages, patches...
I've checked with a fresh installation of amule on a Saucy installation, it stores music in ~/.aMule/incomming
In perspective of accasibility, I agree with this bug report. A normal user wouldn't look for his downloads in a hidden folder.
But the folder Downloads isn't logical neighter. Your aMule downloads will be mixed with the normal downloads (ex firefox)...
Who should I ask to help me pick the right folder? (I think 'Music' makes more sense but a seperate visible folder 'aMule' would to)
For now I didn't got a answer from the aMule community, but will it be ok just to make a Ubuntu patch without implementing the patch upstream (should they choos to keep the current folder)?