Comment 14 for bug 316889

Revision history for this message
Bogdan Butnaru (bogdanb) wrote : Re: [Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

Hi AlterEgo,

It would be nice to do that, but I doubt I'll find the time to do it
soon. I'm considering a few other bugs too (the Wikipedia display
hasn't been working for a while, and I'd like to use the new
notification system for the OSD), but I'll be quite busy with work for
the next month at least.

But patches are always welcome :-)

-- Bogdan Butnaru

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:59 PM, AlterEgo <email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi Bogdan Butnaru ,
>
> I really appreciate your Amarok 1.4 packages. Are you considering updating those packages according to:
>  [USN-739-1] Amarok vulnerabilities?
>
> Many thanks!
>
> --
> [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316889
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>