This may be helpful. I've got two nearly identical Compaq Evo desktops
at the office. One loaded 10.10 flawlessly from the usb and the other
one died on the squashfs file system mount (using the very same usb).
Since they're so similar, the differences might be important. I've
uploaded the lshw output from both machines here (the machine which
failed to load 10.10 is running 8.10):
This may be helpful. I've got two nearly identical Compaq Evo desktops
at the office. One loaded 10.10 flawlessly from the usb and the other
one died on the squashfs file system mount (using the very same usb).
Since they're so similar, the differences might be important. I've
uploaded the lshw output from both machines here (the machine which
failed to load 10.10 is running 8.10):
http:// www.ncf. ca/~es625/ usb_install_ non_working_ compaq
and here:
http:// web.ncf. ca/~es625/ usb_install_ working_ compaq
Maybe someone can figure out what's going on.
One difference that could be a factor is in the video driver:
Bad machine:
description: Host bridge GL[Brookdale- G]/GE/PE DRAM Controller/Host-Hub
configuratio n: driver= agpgart- intel module=intel_agp <=
*-pci
product: 82845G/
Interface
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 100
bus info: pci@0000:00:00.0
version: 01
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
*-display UNCLAIMED <=
Good machine:
description: Host bridge GL[Brookdale- G]/GE/PE DRAM Controller/Host-Hub
configuratio n: driver= agpgart- intel <=
resources: irq:0 memory: f8000000- fbffffff <=
*-pci
product: 82845G/
Interface
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 100
bus info: pci@0000:00:00.0
version: 01
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
*-display <=