-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> Package was rejected by archive for copyright problems: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2008-September/021524.html
I've notified upstream about this and they're looking into it (e.g. if libraries are included already in Ubuntu).
Jonathan wrote:
> Also full copies of the GPL and LGPL are important.
Isn't it enough to refer to the ones provided by Debian/Ubuntu? Or does this only hold for debian/copyright and the source tarball needs them anyway?
- -- http://daniel.hahler.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIzuekfAK/hT/mPgARAjA2AKCSpNqGWRyU31zMWDBquWGWenmtHACdGQNT 6LMrPeRvRSpS1SDSXp3v5qk= =D00I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> Package was rejected by archive for copyright problems: /lists. ubuntu. com/archives/ ubuntu- archive/ 2008-September/ 021524. html
>
> https:/
I've notified upstream about this and they're looking into it (e.g. if
libraries are included already in Ubuntu).
Jonathan wrote:
> Also full copies of the GPL and LGPL are important.
Isn't it enough to refer to the ones provided by Debian/Ubuntu? Or does
this only hold for debian/copyright and the source tarball needs them
anyway?
- -- daniel. hahler. de/ enigmail. mozdev. org
http://
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFIzuekfAK /hT/mPgARAjA2AK CSpNqGWRyU31zMW DBquWGWenmtHACd GQNT SXp3v5qk=
6LMrPeRvRSpS1SD
=D00I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----