Quoting Paul Sladen (<email address hidden>):
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I think I would be putting all the formats in one package, or using
> > fonts-[foundry]-fontname-console.
>
> I've uploaded a bump of 'ubuntu-font-family-sources' Source with the
> console-font building code uncommented[0][1]:
>
> $ dpkg -L fonts-ubuntu-font-family-console | grep psf
> /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-R-8x16.psf
> /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-BI-8x16.psf
> /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-B-8x16.psf
> /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-RI-8x16.psf
>
> This second binary is in addition to the current main
> 'ttf-ubuntu-font-family' binary. I would be grateful for advice about
> what would be the best name for a renamed main binary package.
Hmm, that seems tricky.
I'm personnally nnot entirely happy with
fonts-ubuntu-font-family-whatever. It seems weird to repeat "font" in
the pkg name and "family" is not exactly a font name.
Indeed, how about simply "fonts-ubuntu" for the package providing the
TTF|OTF fonts and fonts-ubuntu-console for the package providing the
console fonts. Is there a chance that there is a
fonts-ubuntu-somethingelse for another font family provided by the
"ubuntu" foundry?
CC'ing you, Paul though I'm unsure this is needed as you're probably
subscribed to the LP bug.
Quoting Paul Sladen (<email address hidden>): foundry] -fontname- console. font-family- sources' Source with the font-family- console | grep psf consolefonts/ UbuntuMono- R-8x16. psf consolefonts/ UbuntuMono- BI-8x16. psf consolefonts/ UbuntuMono- B-8x16. psf consolefonts/ UbuntuMono- RI-8x16. psf font-family' binary. I would be grateful for advice about
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I think I would be putting all the formats in one package, or using
> > fonts-[
>
> I've uploaded a bump of 'ubuntu-
> console-font building code uncommented[0][1]:
>
> $ dpkg -L fonts-ubuntu-
> /usr/share/
> /usr/share/
> /usr/share/
> /usr/share/
>
> This second binary is in addition to the current main
> 'ttf-ubuntu-
> what would be the best name for a renamed main binary package.
Hmm, that seems tricky.
I'm personnally nnot entirely happy with font-family- whatever. It seems weird to repeat "font" in
fonts-ubuntu-
the pkg name and "family" is not exactly a font name.
Indeed, how about simply "fonts-ubuntu" for the package providing the console for the package providing the somethingelse for another font family provided by the
TTF|OTF fonts and fonts-ubuntu-
console fonts. Is there a chance that there is a
fonts-ubuntu-
"ubuntu" foundry?
CC'ing you, Paul though I'm unsure this is needed as you're probably
subscribed to the LP bug.