Comment 2 for bug 677112

We're currently waiting for feedback from Mark and the Canonical team on the 'm'. We simply proposed a number of potential solutions to the 'm', some more creative than others, to illustrate the difficulty of putting a crowded character onto a fixed and narrow width.

I believe that the most conventional and conservative route is probably the best forward. Although it creates a bit of a spot effect it is least disruptive. When it comes to hinting we have to see how the glyph behaves at the smaller ppm sizes.