We're currently waiting for feedback from Mark and the Canonical team on the 'm'. We simply proposed a number of potential solutions to the 'm', some more creative than others, to illustrate the difficulty of putting a crowded character onto a fixed and narrow width.
I believe that the most conventional and conservative route is probably the best forward. Although it creates a bit of a spot effect it is least disruptive. When it comes to hinting we have to see how the glyph behaves at the smaller ppm sizes.
We're currently waiting for feedback from Mark and the Canonical team on the 'm'. We simply proposed a number of potential solutions to the 'm', some more creative than others, to illustrate the difficulty of putting a crowded character onto a fixed and narrow width.
I believe that the most conventional and conservative route is probably the best forward. Although it creates a bit of a spot effect it is least disruptive. When it comes to hinting we have to see how the glyph behaves at the smaller ppm sizes.