Comment 7 for bug 632267
Revision history for this message
| David Marshall (dave-daltonmaag) wrote Re: [Bug 632267] Re: Technical: reverse-mapped 'μΔfifl' (detected by warning in FontForge) | #7 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
f33e652
(Get the code!)
It's very unlikely that you'll encounter documents which contain
U+F001/U+F002. The reason for codepoints being granted for the ligatures
was to allow a one-to-one mapping from legacy encodings which included
the characters, such as Windows CP-1252. They are just presentational
forms so they won't have been widely used in real Unicode documents at
the time
Dave