Log in / Register
Ubuntu Font Family
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #632267
Comment #5
Comment 5 for bug 632267
Revision history for this message
Alan Bell (alanbell)
wrote
on 2010-09-30
:
Re: Technical: reverse-mapped 'μΔfifl' (detected by warning in FontForge)
#5
so should this be filed as a bug in fontforge, or is it still valid to warn about such things?
so should this be filed as a bug in fontforge, or is it still valid to warn about such things?
so should this be filed as a bug in fontforge, or is it still valid to warn about such things?