Comment 10 for bug 191681

Revision history for this message
Andrew Stromme (astromme) wrote : Re: [Bug 191681] Re: If an external drive is used for backups, Timevault will write backups if the drive is not present
  • unnamed Edit (1.7 KiB, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)

That is an interesting project. I wonder if TimeVault and retrospekt could
share a common backend. That would be a lot of work, though it would make
for an interesting result. I wouldn't mind having a desktop-antagonistic
backup solution.

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, mikeh <email address hidden> wrote:

> >TimeVault should cache my snapshots while my drive is unplugged, and then
> copy them over?
> >TimeVault should recognize other TimeVault backups stored on drives when
> they are plugged in?
>
> I like this sort of, I am using a separate dir
> (/home/.private/.snapshots/...) for my backups using retrospekt, but
> like the timevault using inotify. This is great, snapshoting just a file
> when it needs it. I like that. I do like retrospekt's timeline in
> konqueror tho.
>
> What would be great is the possibility of using that directory for my
> snapshots, then mirroring them to my usb drive when it is plugged in in
> teh office. Or maybe when I plug in the usb drive it makes a monthly, or
> weekly snap plus mirroring the currently snaps.
>
> --
> If an external drive is used for backups, Timevault will write backups if
> the drive is not present
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191681
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>