That is an interesting project. I wonder if TimeVault and retrospekt could share a common backend. That would be a lot of work, though it would make for an interesting result. I wouldn&#39;t mind having a desktop-antagonistic backup solution.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, mikeh &lt;<a href="mailto:mikeh@ptfd.org">mikeh@ptfd.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">&gt;TimeVault should cache my snapshots while my drive is unplugged, and then copy them over?<br>
&gt;TimeVault should recognize other TimeVault backups stored on drives when they are plugged in?<br>
<br>
</div>I like this sort of, I am using a separate dir<br>
(/home/.private/.snapshots/...) for my backups using retrospekt, but<br>
like the timevault using inotify. This is great, snapshoting just a file<br>
when it needs it. I like that. I do like retrospekt&#39;s timeline in<br>
konqueror tho.<br>
<br>
What would be great is the possibility of using that directory for my<br>
snapshots, then mirroring them to my usb drive when it is plugged in in<br>
teh office. Or maybe when I plug in the usb drive it makes a monthly, or<br>
weekly snap plus mirroring the currently snaps.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
--<br>
If an external drive is used for backups, Timevault will write backups if the drive is not present<br>
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191681" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191681</a><br>
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber<br>
of the bug.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>