Yes, that would make sense. I'll make sure it gets included in the merge
proposal, when it'll be ready.
Wouldn't it be better to use "lsb_release -i" (or whatever) instead of
> coding in the operating system name.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361788
>
> Title:
> Show explanatory page when Privacy Mode is enabled [$35]
>
> Status in Switchboard Security & Privacy Plug:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> To prevent user interaction with the data sources when "Privacy Mode"
> is on, instead of making the views insensitive show a section
> explaining what Privacy Mode is –you can see the included screenshot
> for details.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/switchboard-plug-security-privacy/+bug/1361788/+subscriptions
>
Yes, that would make sense. I'll make sure it gets included in the merge
proposal, when it'll be ready.
Wouldn't it be better to use "lsb_release -i" (or whatever) instead of /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1361788 /bugs.launchpad .net/switchboar d-plug- security- privacy/ +bug/1361788/ +subscriptions
> coding in the operating system name.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Show explanatory page when Privacy Mode is enabled [$35]
>
> Status in Switchboard Security & Privacy Plug:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> To prevent user interaction with the data sources when "Privacy Mode"
> is on, instead of making the views insensitive show a section
> explaining what Privacy Mode is –you can see the included screenshot
> for details.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https:/
>