Percona Server moved to https://jira.percona.com/projects/PS

  1. Bug #314510
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 314510

Revision history for this message
Vadim Tkachenko (vadim-tk) wrote : Re: [Percona-discussion] [Bug 314510] Re: FR: split innodb_flush_method into two parameters

Peter,

Also by plugin design all variables to related to plugin should start
with PLAGINNAME_

so as far as internally we keep plugin name innodb - all variables start
innodb_.

to move to xtradb_ naming we should rename plugin and therefore all
variables will be renamed, that will require a lot of work to handle
properly.

Peter Zaitsev wrote:
> Xaprb,
>
> Generally I'd call them innodb_XXX for simplicity reasons - we call
> all parameters Innodb. Also we may want to backport some of the
> changes to 5.0... and this is driven by customer feedback.
>
> Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 5:06:16 AM, you wrote:
>
>> I am not sure whether this should go into XtraDB only, or into our
>> builds without XtraDB...
>
>> if it goes into the builds that have InnoDB, then:
>
>> innodb_datafile_flush_method
>> innodb_logfile_flush_method
>
>> if it goes into XtraDB, then those parameters should start with xtradb_
>> instead.
>
>
>
>

--
Vadim Tkachenko, CTO
Percona Inc.
ICQ: 369-510-335, Skype: vadimtk153, Phone +1-888-401-3403
MySQL Performance Blog - http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com
MySQL Consulting http://www.percona.com/