MonoUML

  1. Bug #123608
  2. Comment #2

Comment 2 for bug 123608

Revision history for this message
Mario Carrion (mario-carrion) wrote :

There's a bug related to nUML TemplateBinding,[1] it's kind of blocker for the implementation, however skipping the "binding" (for now) is the solution.

[1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1749449&group_id=163831&atid=829292