Mir will cause fragmentation in Linux on desktop
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mir |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Since other Linux-Distribution will hold on to wayland, Mir will lead to a heavy fragmentation in Linux.
Why other distributions (unless they are deviates of Ubuntu) won't support Mir:
- You can't just simple work together with others on Mir, you have to sign a contract to submit mainstream changes.
- Wayland is far more advanced. (This argument has to become invalid in near future)
- Mir is centered around Unity(Next), other desktop-
Solution:
Since Mir isn't advanced too far and Wayland has a heavy development ongoing, switch back to Wayland (Build Mir as a replacement for Weston if you like to...)
You could even convince those guys to deliver a "wayland light" (without those problematic parts)
Advantages:
1. Wayland has many of the "Mir-ToDos" solved already
2. You can guide the wayland-project to its goal (being *the* replacement of X.org)
3. Wayland is developed by the *community* [Canonical can step into the development but won't need as much developers as Mir will be taking]
4. Linux for desktop[which includes Tablets and even Phones] isn't parted as heavily as it will be with the introduction of Mir (see reasons above)
5. Graphic-Vendors (namely Nvidia, Amd Graphics) will adapt this new standard faster (because it is only *one* standard)
Disadvantages:
1. You have to contact the people from wayland.
2. You have to discuss steps which potentially aren't constructive.
3. Bad press (hey you guys have practice in this^^)
4. wayland isn't invented by Canonical
PS:
Divide et impera [Divide and rule] - Niccolò Machiavelli (1469–1527)
to address bug #1 Microsoft, Google and Apple will have a much higher chance to continue being market leaders, if (GNU) Linux can't bundle it's forces.
no longer affects: | ubuntu |
Changed in mir: | |
status: | Invalid → Opinion |
status: | Opinion → Invalid |
Changed in mir: | |
status: | Invalid → In Progress |
Changed in mir: | |
status: | In Progress → Opinion |
My belief is that, in order for Unity to excel, it needs to detach from the "legacy of bad interfaces" that is represented by all the other desktop environments and display servers, and start fresh. If you look in the application store right now, you will find that 90% of the applications simply do not match Unity design guidelines or do not even have a friendly design, which is vital if Ubuntu really wants to succeed on this side.
Also, work on Wayland/Weston started in 2008. It is 2013, and, only now has it started to get some momentum. Ubuntu started work on Mir in June 2012 and it is already rolling it out to the public, with the first major release in October 2013.
If you read the https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/MirSpec, you will find some of the reasons behind this "rupture", as well as the plans for compatibility with X11/Weston.
I like Ubuntu's boldness and I think it will only make other distros more aware of the need to be competitive.