#17 (@fdrs):
Amen^^
True words are spoken here. I would much more prefer it if Mir would be using Wayland...
but as long as we aren't confronted with "Wayland/Mir"-specific software/hardware (which shouldn't be the case because of abstraction-layers as pointed out by you @fdrs ) I'm ok with it.
And the news from Canonical about Mir are giving me the hope that this topic (interoperability) will be addressed at the time of designing/building Mir.
#17 (@fdrs): Mir"-specific software/hardware (which shouldn't be the case because of abstraction-layers as pointed out by you @fdrs ) I'm ok with it.
Amen^^
True words are spoken here. I would much more prefer it if Mir would be using Wayland...
but as long as we aren't confronted with "Wayland/
And the news from Canonical about Mir are giving me the hope that this topic (interoperability) will be addressed at the time of designing/building Mir.
Kind regards
Simon