Originally IP was supposed to link to node details but agreed with Andres we could have the FQDN. Both info is important for identifying the machine so would leave them as separate columns for now.
Think the challenge here is grouping content in a logical way. "Usage" is the type of node, so related to FQDN. "Type" seems to be type of IP address.
So with the current content, IP adress - type - interface - FQDN - usage - owner - last seen would be the most logical order. This way related columns are next to each other.
So far, the user texting participants find the content/labels on this table a bit confusing, so might need more work later. But hopefully this is a solid fix for now.
Originally IP was supposed to link to node details but agreed with Andres we could have the FQDN. Both info is important for identifying the machine so would leave them as separate columns for now.
Think the challenge here is grouping content in a logical way. "Usage" is the type of node, so related to FQDN. "Type" seems to be type of IP address.
So with the current content, IP adress - type - interface - FQDN - usage - owner - last seen would be the most logical order. This way related columns are next to each other.
So far, the user texting participants find the content/labels on this table a bit confusing, so might need more work later. But hopefully this is a solid fix for now.