Comment 11 for bug 800361

We have a UI ready to implement: http://people.canonical.com/~curtis/person-picker/person-picker-0.html

This presentation overlaps with bug 798764 and bug 798759.

 * It is not obvious that "Jonnty" is a team.
  - The red icon caused confusion with the "required person" icon in blueprints.
  - Most people didn't even notice the different colour.
  - The word "Team" next to the name/ID would be easier for people to spot and understand.
  ! We will use the default team icon of course, but we may want to try to append "team" to the team name?
 * The affiliation info is really useful.
 * There was confusion over whether the logo indicated a team or a project affiliation.
   ! This has always been true since teams often reuse project icons :( I think the listing of the project role answers user questions.

The UI implies we know more than the maintain role.