On 22 July 2010 11:35, Tim Penhey <email address hidden> wrote:
> Subscriptions to merge proposals were vetoed initially due to the short
> lifecycle of a proposal. At least that was the argument at the time.
This is about the 5th dupe of this bug so I think we could change it.
Possibly people could subscribe to the source branch, but I think they
actually want to follow just the discussion.
On 22 July 2010 11:35, Tim Penhey <email address hidden> wrote:
> Subscriptions to merge proposals were vetoed initially due to the short
> lifecycle of a proposal. At least that was the argument at the time.
This is about the 5th dupe of this bug so I think we could change it.
Possibly people could subscribe to the source branch, but I think they
actually want to follow just the discussion.
--
Martin