On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Michael Hudson
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Aaron suggested a lo-fi way of fixing this: have the worker exit with a
> distinct exit code in each of the "success, new revisions", "success, no
> new revisions" and "error" cases. The way Python is, we more-or-less
> have to have exit == 1 for the error case, but we can us anything we
> like for the other cases.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Michael Hudson
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Aaron suggested a lo-fi way of fixing this: have the worker exit with a
> distinct exit code in each of the "success, new revisions", "success, no
> new revisions" and "error" cases. The way Python is, we more-or-less
> have to have exit == 1 for the error case, but we can us anything we
> like for the other cases.
I like it.
jml