Comment 15 for bug 191199

Revision history for this message
In , Bradley Baetz (bbaetz) wrote :

I forgot to mention that the reason I marked my patch obsolete, and moved this
to 2.18, was because I checked that patch in. Oops.

Yes, I did mean bug 126266, sorry. If that patch goes in as is, we could just
add the use of the Param to the xml header. In any event, working out the
encoding for the xml output implies working out the encoding for the rest of
bugzilla.

We only really support ascii at the moment, I believe, so UTF8 is sort of
correct. The problem in that other bug and related issues is that we don't have
a way of defined what encoding is being used.