I see - thanks for the detailed explanation. I believe that this is because the colon in the package's version isn't being URL-encoded in that link, so Chrome/Chromium takes a strict interpretation of it as an unknown scheme or similar while Firefox tolerates it. RFC 1738 is clear that we should be URL-encoding the colon.
I see - thanks for the detailed explanation. I believe that this is because the colon in the package's version isn't being URL-encoded in that link, so Chrome/Chromium takes a strict interpretation of it as an unknown scheme or similar while Firefox tolerates it. RFC 1738 is clear that we should be URL-encoding the colon.