A couple of comments, but +1:
[1] + if hash: + return hash
"If hash is not None" looks like a better condition
[2] + the desidered mapping is not found.
Typo: desired?
[3] It would be nice to have a test when multiple HashIdStore are involved.
Thanks!
A couple of comments, but +1:
[1]
+ if hash:
+ return hash
"If hash is not None" looks like a better condition
[2]
+ the desidered mapping is not found.
Typo: desired?
[3] It would be nice to have a test when multiple HashIdStore are involved.
Thanks!