Comment 4 for bug 1522583
Revision history for this message
| Kerusey Karyu (keruseykaryu-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
> It seems to me the ERC is doing it's job as expect.
In an example of two local labels written in different scheme. If we have at least one pair for them, ERC will fail.
> I would prefer not to strip anything off my labels. The trailing ~ in
> you hypothetical example is unnecessary.
Look at it from the right side. The two designers involved in the one project. One design microprocessor part sheets, a second an I/O sheets. One has a habit of writing ~LABEL, second one use ~LABEL~.
Do they have a chance to draw a diagram so that the ERC will detect no error? Yes! Terms that I described are enough.
> I'm not sure how serious this problem is given that
> the ERC does the correct thing.
Use this simple schematic and check. ERC will be blind...