Comment 2 for bug 1961107

Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote : Re: [Bug 1961107] Re: channel parsing is too loose

Do we want to support branches with just a 2 term syntax? I guess
'stable/candidate/beta/edge' are all fixed strings, so it probably isn't
ambiguous. I just wonder if it is ambiguous to users.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 7:50 AM Simon Richardson <email address hidden>
wrote:

> So currently branches are correctly not supported. What you're actually
> seeing here is the dropping of the branch. Charmhub didn't originally
> support branches, so there wasn't a way to implement or verify the
> implementation.
>
> I'll investigate the work required for this to happen.
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Status: New => Triaged
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961107
>
> Title:
> channel parsing is too loose
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1961107/+subscriptions
>
>