Do we want to support branches with just a 2 term syntax? I guess
'stable/candidate/beta/edge' are all fixed strings, so it probably isn't
ambiguous. I just wonder if it is ambiguous to users.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 7:50 AM Simon Richardson <email address hidden>
wrote:
> So currently branches are correctly not supported. What you're actually
> seeing here is the dropping of the branch. Charmhub didn't originally
> support branches, so there wasn't a way to implement or verify the
> implementation.
>
> I'll investigate the work required for this to happen.
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Status: New => Triaged
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961107
>
> Title:
> channel parsing is too loose
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1961107/+subscriptions
>
>
Do we want to support branches with just a 2 term syntax? I guess candidate/ beta/edge' are all fixed strings, so it probably isn't
'stable/
ambiguous. I just wonder if it is ambiguous to users.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 7:50 AM Simon Richardson <email address hidden>
wrote:
> So currently branches are correctly not supported. What you're actually /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1961107 /bugs.launchpad .net/juju/ +bug/1961107/ +subscriptions
> seeing here is the dropping of the branch. Charmhub didn't originally
> support branches, so there wasn't a way to implement or verify the
> implementation.
>
> I'll investigate the work required for this to happen.
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Status: New => Triaged
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
> https:/
>
> Title:
> channel parsing is too loose
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>
>