Dimiter- should this be considered fixed? Or do we still end up adding
something to state?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Dimiter Naydenov
<email address hidden> wrote:
> And now, calling add-machine without arguments actually reports:
>
> ERROR juju.cmd supercommand.go:296 cannot add a new machine: use "juju
> add-machine ssh:[user@]<host>" to provision machines
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju-
> core.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256615
>
> Title:
> add-machine in manual environment without ssh should fail
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1256615/+subscriptions
Dimiter- should this be considered fixed? Or do we still end up adding
something to state?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Dimiter Naydenov /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1256615 /bugs.launchpad .net/juju- core/+bug/ 1256615/ +subscriptions
<email address hidden> wrote:
> And now, calling add-machine without arguments actually reports:
>
> ERROR juju.cmd supercommand.go:296 cannot add a new machine: use "juju
> add-machine ssh:[user@]<host>" to provision machines
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju-
> core.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> add-machine in manual environment without ssh should fail
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/