On 2013-09-18 5:37, Dave Cheney wrote:
> Investigating.
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Status: New => In Progress
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Milestone: None => 1.15.0
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Cheney
> (dave-cheney)
>
I know we want to avoid using CGO for stuff like Windows. But my
personal recommendation would be "it is fine to use if we have it, but
we shouldn't require it".
That said, if we aren't going to use it everywhere, and it has
*functional* differences, then maybe we shouldn't use it anywhere. So
that we discover bugs like this earlier, rather than as some obscure
difference on some different platform.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-09-18 5:37, Dave Cheney wrote:
> Investigating.
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Status: New => In Progress
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Milestone: None => 1.15.0
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Cheney
> (dave-cheney)
>
I know we want to avoid using CGO for stuff like Windows. But my
personal recommendation would be "it is fine to use if we have it, but
we shouldn't require it".
That said, if we aren't going to use it everywhere, and it has
*functional* differences, then maybe we shouldn't use it anywhere. So
that we discover bugs like this earlier, rather than as some obscure
difference on some different platform.
John www.enigmail. net/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAlI 5SG4ACgkQJdeBCY SNAAN5/ QCeOyTmBnljSRT5 uXQNxVqNgh+ l CzvJGjo6zNIeV3f 22
7cAAoMj5MBBEJMN
=6xMp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----