> [Test Case]
>
> With all other changes in position, Intel VSC driver modules are to be loaded as a soft dependency of some selected camera sensor modules. LJCA modules should be loaded automatically on MTL platforms as well.
>
> To actually verify the camera framework:
> ```
> $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:oem-solutions-group/intel-ipu6
> $ sudo apt install linux-oem-22.04d
What is this "linux-oem-22.04d" package, why is it needed, and where does it come from?
These come from the oem ppa?
What can we test without these two packages installed, i.e., what can be tested with a pristine mantic installation?
Will these two packages make it into the ubuntu archive for mantic at some point? Is there a bug for that effort?
ok, so let's see:
> [Test Case] solutions- group/intel- ipu6
>
> With all other changes in position, Intel VSC driver modules are to be loaded as a soft dependency of some selected camera sensor modules. LJCA modules should be loaded automatically on MTL platforms as well.
>
> To actually verify the camera framework:
> ```
> $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:oem-
> $ sudo apt install linux-oem-22.04d
What is this "linux-oem-22.04d" package, why is it needed, and where does it come from?
> $ sudo apt install intel-ipu6-dkms intel-vsc-dkms
> $ sudo apt install intel-usbio-dkms # from bug 2041800
So we need that to land in mantic-proposed too, right? Looks like it still needs sponsoring?
> $ sudo apt install gstreamer1. 0-icamera v4l2-relayd
These come from the oem ppa?
What can we test without these two packages installed, i.e., what can be tested with a pristine mantic installation?
Will these two packages make it into the ubuntu archive for mantic at some point? Is there a bug for that effort?