I remember working through this 4 years ago when I was focused more on the power management. The aim at the time the aim was just to get some better consistency;
that's the last commit that had the original in-source documentation about what to do, and which was removed in the next commit. At the time the aim was settling on Suspend/Resume and Hibernate/Resume. Hibernate is generally fine because in English people have often heard about fluffy polar bears in winter. Suspend was better-than-the-other-options.
Perhaps the thing to do here would be to get some hard user testing, and if we have a verifiable outcome then to go about patching everything system-wide at an Upstream level?
I remember working through this 4 years ago when I was focused more on the power management. The aim at the time the aim was just to get some better consistency;
http:// git.gnome. org/browse/ gnome-power- manager/ tree/docs/ sleep-names. html?id= 313d76583201b30 8f173d0803e120e ba68e0c9c0
that's the last commit that had the original in-source documentation about what to do, and which was removed in the next commit. At the time the aim was settling on Suspend/Resume and Hibernate/Resume. Hibernate is generally fine because in English people have often heard about fluffy polar bears in winter. Suspend was better- than-the- other-options.
Perhaps the thing to do here would be to get some hard user testing, and if we have a verifiable outcome then to go about patching everything system-wide at an Upstream level?