I wouldn't say this is a duplicate of bug 160151. It's more like this is a request for a workaround, and bug 160151 is a request for a fix.
I'd much rather have snapping fixed (bug 160151) than having the broken implementation tuned (this bug).
I wouldn't say this is a duplicate of bug 160151. It's more like this is a request for a workaround, and bug 160151 is a request for a fix.
I'd much rather have snapping fixed (bug 160151) than having the broken implementation tuned (this bug).