On 26/08/2010 12:01 a.m., Kazade wrote:
> I think most native speakers are happy with either "Bin" or "Rubbish
> Bin". I'd personally prefer "Bin" (as I wouldn't really refer to deleted
> files "rubbish") but "Rubbish Bin" is fine if we are going with the
> waste container metaphor. As mentioned above, gmail uses "Bin" and that
> seems very natural.
>
Actually, I think gMail uses "Trash", not "Bin".
Also, in my opinion, Trash sounds better.
On 26/08/2010 12:01 a.m., Kazade wrote:
> I think most native speakers are happy with either "Bin" or "Rubbish
> Bin". I'd personally prefer "Bin" (as I wouldn't really refer to deleted
> files "rubbish") but "Rubbish Bin" is fine if we are going with the
> waste container metaphor. As mentioned above, gmail uses "Bin" and that
> seems very natural.
>
Actually, I think gMail uses "Trash", not "Bin".
Also, in my opinion, Trash sounds better.
--cody