@Mathew, my comments are only after i'v read the wiki...
Since its a wiki , and atleast 1yr old page , it is not clear who has made the page...
AFAIC , it doesnt seem to be an official page , or an official decision Ubuntu wants to take...
If it was the official decision , why was it not done for 3 yrs?
why does Mark Shuttlework still refer to the versions using codenames, in his interviews ?
I dont recall any mailing list discussions which have concluded to accept the removal of code names.
@Mathew, my comments are only after i'v read the wiki...
Since its a wiki , and atleast 1yr old page , it is not clear who has made the page...
AFAIC , it doesnt seem to be an official page , or an official decision Ubuntu wants to take...
If it was the official decision , why was it not done for 3 yrs?
why does Mark Shuttlework still refer to the versions using codenames, in his interviews ?
I dont recall any mailing list discussions which have concluded to accept the removal of code names.
And, the arguments i have raised above are valid.