I thought we recently made a change (in the NSI script) to make the
examples/ directory read-only? Isn't this targeted for 1.3.7?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:47 AM, The Escapist <email address hidden> wrote:
> Fair enough, on the other hand it's worth keeping in mind that ANY file
> assembled by GNUSim8085 will also be IMPLICITLY SAVED, so even the
> examples would be updated once being run:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnusim8085/+bug/680462
>
> Otherwise one could just as well add a condition that checks that the
> files are not stored within the program directory, to avoid accidental
> deletion.
>
> But with the current method of implicitly saving files before
> assembling, this won't work too well.
>
> --
> critical bug (data loss!) when uninstalling on Windows
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680426
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of
> GNUSim8085 Administrators, which is the registrant for gnusim8085.
>
I thought we recently made a change (in the NSI script) to make the
examples/ directory read-only? Isn't this targeted for 1.3.7?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:47 AM, The Escapist <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/gnusim8085 /+bug/680462 /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 680426
> Fair enough, on the other hand it's worth keeping in mind that ANY file
> assembled by GNUSim8085 will also be IMPLICITLY SAVED, so even the
> examples would be updated once being run:
> https:/
>
> Otherwise one could just as well add a condition that checks that the
> files are not stored within the program directory, to avoid accidental
> deletion.
>
> But with the current method of implicitly saving files before
> assembling, this won't work too well.
>
> --
> critical bug (data loss!) when uninstalling on Windows
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of
> GNUSim8085 Administrators, which is the registrant for gnusim8085.
>