Log in / Register
Evergreen
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Series 3.2
Bug #1747542
Comment #3
Comment 3 for bug 1747542
Revision history for this message
Jason Stephenson (jstephenson)
wrote
on 2018-05-23
:
#3
Looks like we're using LOST and not LONGOVERDUE, so there's no way for us to really test this.
Looks like we're using LOST and not LONGOVERDUE, so there's no way for us to really test this.
Looks like we're using LOST and not LONGOVERDUE, so there's no way for us to really test this.