Comment 7 for bug 2071372

Revision history for this message
Mike Rylander (mrylander) wrote :

Blake, thanks for the data. It doesn't look like the the latest attachments (comments 5 and 6) are related to the the details listed in the early comment 2. Is that correct? If so, what is the focus you're concerned with on those attachments? Is it the initial date-transform concern from the initial report?