Comment 2 for bug 1984110

In my previous comment #1, I neglected to mention that my testing was on Evergreen 3.7.

We are currently on 3.10, and I now find that action triggers using the hold_request.cancel.expire_no_target hook are processing as expected. Lindsay, if you enable an action trigger that uses the hold_request.cancel.expire_no_target hook, does that trigger a notice when a hold is cancelled as a result of directly deleting the last item?

The stock action triggers using this hook are:

Hold Cancelled (No Target) Email Notification
Hold Cancelled (No Target) User Message