Note: there is also a bug that if there are multiple edition fields, only one displays, LP# 1802128.
This is somewhat out of the scope of this bug, but I think it's important, that if MARC fields are repeatable in the bib record, then the fields should all display in the web client and public OPAC.
This is a new bug but I thought I remembered a discussion about this before. This is not the only repeatable field that does not display in the OPAC.
I can confirm that this is happening on REL 3.2.8. in both the web client and in the public OPAC. I can also confirm that with multiple contents note, it's not always the same one that displays. /bark.cwmars. org/eg/ opac/record/ 4248805? fi%3Asearch_ format= blu-ray; locg=1; detail_ record_ view=0; page=0; sort=poprel; query=title% 3Abeatles% 20white% 20album; badges= 1;expand= marchtml# marchtml
https:/
In this example, the bib record for "Beatles White album" has six 505 fields for the music CDs. The first time I looked at it in the public OPAC, the contents for CD one displayed, the next time it was CD six.
Note: the same problem exists for multiple 520 (annotation) fields. /bark.cwmars. org/eg/ opac/record/ 3763461? query=grisham% 20asociado; qtype=keyword; fi%3Asearch_ format= ;locg=1; detail_ record_ view=0; _adv=1; page=0; fi%3Aitem_ lang=spa; sort=poprel
https:/
This record has two 520 fields, one in Spanish and one in English. The English one is first in the bib record, but only the second, the Spanish one, displays.
Note: there is also a bug that if there are multiple edition fields, only one displays, LP# 1802128.
This is somewhat out of the scope of this bug, but I think it's important, that if MARC fields are repeatable in the bib record, then the fields should all display in the web client and public OPAC.
Janet