As of bug 1744385, the OPAC templates do use display attributes for the ISBN, so the question of adding a definition that includes the subfield $q in the display entry is more significant.
Also, I have a display question: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd020.html suggests that a display convention is to include the qualifier in parenthesis. Should we include that?
Setting to needsrepatch for now.
As of bug 1744385, the OPAC templates do use display attributes for the ISBN, so the question of adding a definition that includes the subfield $q in the display entry is more significant.
Also, I have a display question: https:/ /www.loc. gov/marc/ bibliographic/ bd020.html suggests that a display convention is to include the qualifier in parenthesis. Should we include that?
Setting to needsrepatch for now.