Add ISBN subfield q to record summary.
Bug #1779319 reported by
Jason Stephenson
This bug affects 36 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Confirmed
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Many recent MARC records come with the format information in the 020 subfield q instead of tacked on the end of the subfield a. For these records the format does not display in the record summary in the OPAC or Staff client but the format does display for the older records that have it tacked onto the end of subfield a.
This branch adds the subfield q to the information gathered for display in the OPAC:
NOTE: CW MARS is already using this code in a custom template in production.
description: | updated |
Changed in evergreen: | |
assignee: | Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) → nobody |
milestone: | none → 3.2-beta |
tags: | added: pullrequest |
tags: | added: needsreleasenote |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.2-beta → 3.2-rc |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.2-rc → 3.2.1 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.2.1 → 3.2.2 |
milestone: | 3.2.2 → 3.next |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.next → 3.3-beta1 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.3-beta1 → 3.3-rc |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.3-rc → 3.next |
Changed in evergreen: | |
assignee: | nobody → Rogan Hamby (rogan-hamby) |
tags: |
added: cataloging needswork removed: needsrepatch |
To post a comment you must log in.
Jason, looking at the code, shouldn't the expression in the inner FOR loop be "isbn.findnodes ('../*[ @code=" q"]')" rather than "xml.findnodes( '../*[@ code="q" ]')"?
Secondarily, should we set up a display field entry for this, either instead of or in addition to?