Should the API signature make note of the new optional param for this feature. Or is that only for required parameters?
Like:
@param safe_token Active safe token
@param who Optional user identifier string for logging.
Otherwise I tested this and it works just as described. I included a file with output from running through a session in srfsh and the logging output that shows the "who" param.
I have tested this code and consent to signing off on it with my
name,Josh Stompro and email address, <email address hidden>.
Should the API signature make note of the new optional param for this feature. Or is that only for required parameters?
Like:
@param safe_token Active safe token
@param who Optional user identifier string for logging.
Otherwise I tested this and it works just as described. I included a file with output from running through a session in srfsh and the logging output that shows the "who" param.
I have tested this code and consent to signing off on it with my
name,Josh Stompro and email address, <email address hidden>.
Josh