I'll add some details about our use case in PINES since it sounds like the "place unfillable hold" feature was assumed to have general applicability for Evergreen-using libraries. PINES libraries range protect both newly-acquired items and audio-visual materials (DVDs, CDs, etc.) per library system so that A/V items do not transit for holds across library system lines, nor do new items for the first 6 months after creation/activation. These rules have been a source of frustration with our patrons for years, so when a message/option comes up in the OPAC that appears to allow patrons permission to place holds on those items, that creates a customer service problem for our libraries and causes the patron to believe they may be able to get around our policies.
It would be best for us if the message/option did not appear and that unfillable holds are not placed.
I'll add some details about our use case in PINES since it sounds like the "place unfillable hold" feature was assumed to have general applicability for Evergreen-using libraries. PINES libraries range protect both newly-acquired items and audio-visual materials (DVDs, CDs, etc.) per library system so that A/V items do not transit for holds across library system lines, nor do new items for the first 6 months after creation/ activation. These rules have been a source of frustration with our patrons for years, so when a message/option comes up in the OPAC that appears to allow patrons permission to place holds on those items, that creates a customer service problem for our libraries and causes the patron to believe they may be able to get around our policies.
It would be best for us if the message/option did not appear and that unfillable holds are not placed.