On 03/31/2011 01:11 PM, David Shrewsbury wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Currently, the transaction_reader utility is not installed. It is only
> available if you build the source. This is a useful tool that should be
> included in Drizzle packaging.
If we're going to install it - we should read name it -
transaction_reader is a bit generic. Perhaps drizzle_transaction_reader
or something?
Also - be sure to ping Derks and I about this when you get a patch that
moves it from noinst_PROGRAMS to bin_PROGRAMS so that we can update the
debs/rpms appropriately.
AND - I nominate this for elliott. Having that program installed won't
break anyone's existing setups, and it is in fact a useful thing.
On 03/31/2011 01:11 PM, David Shrewsbury wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Currently, the transaction_reader utility is not installed. It is only
> available if you build the source. This is a useful tool that should be
> included in Drizzle packaging.
If we're going to install it - we should read name it - transaction_ reader
transaction_reader is a bit generic. Perhaps drizzle_
or something?
Also - be sure to ping Derks and I about this when you get a patch that
moves it from noinst_PROGRAMS to bin_PROGRAMS so that we can update the
debs/rpms appropriately.
AND - I nominate this for elliott. Having that program installed won't
break anyone's existing setups, and it is in fact a useful thing.
Monty