The proposal wasn't for fullfilling the request of the reporter, its a compromise result of some devs' opinions in the discussion of this report (who took time to discuss this report upon my 'daily unanswered bug' campaign).
Again, I generally don't support any hiding of the upgrade nag, but I can accept that a situation when someone doesn't want to upgrade right away, only sometime later, just want to use DC++, setup, several restarts, etc... in this case the nag screen can be annoying and totally unnecessary.
If we want to make these choices then really not.
The proposal wasn't for fullfilling the request of the reporter, its a compromise result of some devs' opinions in the discussion of this report (who took time to discuss this report upon my 'daily unanswered bug' campaign).
Again, I generally don't support any hiding of the upgrade nag, but I can accept that a situation when someone doesn't want to upgrade right away, only sometime later, just want to use DC++, setup, several restarts, etc... in this case the nag screen can be annoying and totally unnecessary.